Performance Benefits of Reciprocal Vicarious Learning in Teams


Journal Article


Christopher G. Myers
Academy of Management Journal, vol. 64(3), 2021 Jun, pp. 926-947


View PDF Article
Cite

Cite

APA   Click to copy
Myers, C. G. (2021). Performance Benefits of Reciprocal Vicarious Learning in Teams. Academy of Management Journal, 64(3), 926–947. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2018.0875


Chicago/Turabian   Click to copy
Myers, Christopher G. “Performance Benefits of Reciprocal Vicarious Learning in Teams.” Academy of Management Journal 64, no. 3 (June 2021): 926–947.


MLA   Click to copy
Myers, Christopher G. “Performance Benefits of Reciprocal Vicarious Learning in Teams.” Academy of Management Journal, vol. 64, no. 3, June 2021, pp. 926–47, doi:10.5465/amj.2018.0875.


BibTeX   Click to copy

@article{christopher2021a,
  title = {Performance Benefits of Reciprocal Vicarious Learning in Teams},
  year = {2021},
  month = jun,
  issue = {3},
  journal = {Academy of Management Journal},
  pages = {926-947},
  volume = {64},
  doi = {10.5465/amj.2018.0875},
  author = {Myers, Christopher G.},
  month_numeric = {6}
}

Team members’ vicarious learning from other members’ knowledge and experience is a critical component of learning and performance in interdependent team work contexts. Yet, our understanding of vicarious learning among individuals in teams is still quite limited, as this learning is often oversimplified (as one-way knowledge-sharing) or aggregated (as a collective, team-level property), resulting in incomplete and inconsistent findings. In this paper, I extend these views by exploring the underlying distribution of dyadic vicarious learning relationships in teams, specifically using a network approach to examine the consequences of reciprocity in team members’ vicarious learning with one another (i.e., where both individuals in a given dyad learn vicariously from each other’s knowledge and experience). Using a novel method for calculating weighted reciprocity in networks in a study of MBA consulting project teams, I demonstrate that greater team vicarious learning reciprocity is associated with greater team performance, and also moderates the performance consequences of teams’ external learning efforts, offering a potential reconciliation of conflicting results in prior research. In doing so, this paper advances research on vicarious learning in teams, while also providing conceptual and empirical tools for studying learning and other interpersonal workplace interactions from a network perspective.


Tools
Translate to